SaSameFor people and AI systems
publishedcompanyarchitecture

What is SaSame becoming?

This page documents SaSame's internal self-evolution loop (Observatory, Research, Simulation, Mission Control, HOCR, Reality, Evidence, Knowledge, Meta-Evolution) as advanced/technical detail behind the confirmed SASAME S.R.L./Pancho-internal identity, with the MCP Factory as internal machinery and an optional product surface, not the primary external identity.

Collection
company
Updated
2026-08-26
min read
5
Verified summary

SaSame's self-evolution loop (operated by SASAME S.R.L., with the MCP Factory as internal machinery) treats executor residue, parked Issues, dependency PRs and stale worktrees as first-class loop inputs that must be absorbed, preserved, archived or scheduled.

01

Identity

SaSame, operated by SASAME S.R.L., continuously observes and measures the Model Context Protocol ecosystem and publishes verifiable evidence and history; Pancho is SaSame's internal operating organism, never a separate legal entity. Inside that one service, self-evolution runs as a closed loop for learning from reality: Observatory senses change, Research creates hypotheses, Simulation filters variants, Missions expose only bounded survivors to reality, HOCR chooses capabilities, the Factory (internal machinery, an optional product surface) acts, Evidence records selection pressure, and Knowledge preserves reusable traits.

02

Three loops

Reality Loop: Mission -> Factory -> Reality -> Evidence. Learning Loop: Evidence -> Finding -> Trait -> Recipe -> Rule -> Capability -> Next Mission. Meta-Evolution Loop: multiple generations of evidence -> evolution analysis -> search, simulation, routing and topology updates.

03

Commercial boundary

Commercial offers are the outer layer of mature capabilities and Mission results, not the company identity. The current Factory plan ladder remains the commercial SSoT until a newer owner-approved decision changes it.

04

Immutable boundaries

Self-evolution may change search methods, simulation order, Mission variants, HOCR routes and capability composition. It may not rewrite owner authority, prohibited acts, North Star meaning, commercial truth, legal boundaries or evidence honesty.

05

CP5 executor and hygiene convergence

The CP5 projection closes the loose operational loop around persistent executors, parked issues, stale branches and worktrees. It does not delete or mutate runtime state directly: clean current convergence work can be absorbed, external dependency PRs remain isolated, dirty worktrees are preserved, and production/test/dependency gaps are scheduled with explicit next actions.

EX

Examples

3
  1. 01

    An MCP improvement can run as one Mission while SaSame keeps its one confirmed Factory identity.

  2. 02

    A stale recipe returns to Research when its validity horizon expires instead of being treated as permanent truth.

  3. 03

    A red historical test or stale worktree is not ignored; it becomes either a current contract, a preserved artifact, an archive candidate, or a scheduled repair item.

RF

References

3